GPYes or GPNo

GPYes or GPNo?

The use of GPS devices in fell races is under question, which side do you fall on?

Unless you have been hiding under a rock for the past few months or else are lucky enough to not have an internet connection, it can’t have escaped your attention that there has been something of a furore (a ruckus even!) over changes or proposed changes, to rules surrounding the use of GPS devices in fell races.

WHAT’S HAPPENED SO FAR?

The debate has, arguably, been a long time coming as the growth in popularity of GPS enabled devices and their availability has meant every start line now rings to a chorus of beeps from the off.

The first rumbles were quite muted, with a general discussion on the FRA (Fell Runner’s Association) online forum.

Initial statements from the FRA committee were fairly open to the use of the devices, pointing out that (particularly) Champs races are rarely a matter of navigation.

This stance was soon put into question when the first counter in the British Fell Champs turned into a very definite navigation exercise in thick clag over the often featureless Mourne Mountains.

Several clubs had already made their position known, though only on race entries as opposed to a public statement, with CFRA (Cumberland Fell Runners Association), organisers of Wasdale and Ennerdale among other races, stating that GPS devices may be carried but not used for navigation.

THE FIRST MOVE.

It was Ambleside AC who fired the first major salvos across the bows of the fell running world though, with a thorough and detailed public statement laying out what they believe the effects of these devices are on the sport of fell running and the rules under which all their future races will be conducted.

With a fairly unambiguous message that:

“use of a GPS-enabled watch for navigational assistance is not permitted.”

See the full statement here

This triggered a landslide of responses from all corners of the hill, fell and mountain running world with thousands of comments and replies across social media and online forums.

The debate even made headlines nationally, being picked up by The Telegraph among others.

GPYes says…

  • Fell running is about running and the majority of people just follow the person in front, so navigation rarely comes into it
  • A GPS device can be the difference between getting a bit lost then finding your way back home safely and getting completely lost, off course and left exposed on a hillside with potentially fatal consequences.
  • GPS just represents one more advancement that will be inevitable absorbed into the sport, just as lightweight kags and sticky rubber were.
  • All runners are required to carry map and compass under FRA rules but how many actually know how to use them? There is no way of checking if they do or not, yet they are allowed to enter races.
  • There are plenty of orienteering races if you want a navigation challenge.
  • These devices are so cheap now (and most phones have it built in), anyone can have one.
  • Those that have recce’d the route or raced it before will have an advantage anyway
  • It will be impossible to police.
  • Map and compass is not infallible
  • It will put off new-comers

“I believe that navigation with a map and compass is a fundamental part of fell running and fell racing. The history and fundamental skills required are based on this as well as the obvious physical requirements.” – Wendy Dodds

GPNo say..

  • Fell running is a test of all round mountain-craft i.e. the ability to get oneself around a set course (or between set checkpoints) over challenging terrain using skills honed over many hours in the hills
  • Reliance on electronic devices erodes self-sufficiency and puts the user at risk when the device fails, and the skill required to navigate without it are rusty or lacking entirely
  • A GPS enabled device is an unnecessary distraction on the hill, a place where most of us go to avoid the encroachment of modern life
  • All those that enter races sign a declaration that they have the necessary skills to get themselves around the course safely. If they do not have these skills and require a GPS to do it, they should not be entering the race.
  • There are plenty of fully-marked trail races if that’s what people want to enter
  • It is not in the spirit of the sport
  • No everyone can afford such devices
  • Recce’ing these routes is part of the fun
  • GPS is not infallible
  • It will put off new-comers

THE CURRENT POSITION.

As Ambleside point out, these rules apply to runners vying for 1st, 5th, 50th or 500th place as it is the runners around you that you are racing, even if you’re not troubling the podium.

The current position from the FRA is that it is up to the RO’s discretion to ban the use of these devices in races but the requirement to carry map and compass remains unchanged. The matter is currently being discussed and any amendments to current rulings will be published in the next issue of the newsletter. No doubt the AGM in August will see some lively debate too!

The challenge for the FRA and Race Organisers is balancing safety of competitors while still preserving the spirit of the sport and ensuring a fair playing field.

The policy is you can:
Wear or carry a GPS device
Record your route
See your distance travelled.

What you cannot do is:
Follow a pre-loaded so-called breadcrumb trail (i.e. set points previously run or plotted that lets you just follow the arrow on the watch face).
Use a device with a map display
Preload checkpoint locations onto your device.

HOW OMM MANAGES GPS USE.

As for our position, it remains unchanged; The OMM is an all-round test of mountain skills, a very big part of which is a competitor’s ability to navigate their way (as a team) around a series of checkpoints, using a map and compass. This was the spirit in which the event was founded 51 years ago, and it remains so to this day.

In recognition of the growing popularity of GPS enabled watches and phone apps, we do state that they may be carried but not used for navigation. If they are used for navigation, it must only be in an emergency, in which case you will be retired from the event anyway.

“We are very happy for competitors to carry GPS… (but) they should not be used for navigation and their use goes against the Corinthian nature of the competition” – Stuart Hamilton, OMM Events Director

The obvious problem we and any race organiser faces is that of policing. How can a RO know if someone is hiding a device and surreptitiously navigating with it?

The simple answer is they can’t. Any rules such as these are only as good as the integrity of the competitor. Thankfully, ours is a sport well defined by its spirit of sportsmanship and the general consensus from online discussion was that while it may be impossible to police thoroughly, once the rules are made clear, the spirit of the sport will prevail, and the vast majority of competitors will abide by them. Those that don’t or are tempted not to will only really be cheating themselves and run the risk of being dobbed in by fellow competitors.

Whatever the ruling from the FRA and whatever the future developments lie in store for fell running, we just hope the spirit of the sport and the sense of fair play that attracts so many of us to it, is preserved.

Postscript: For an interesting discussion on this matter (and a variety of other subjects!) check out the Kong Adventure ‘Running Talk’ Podcast here.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

The poll is now closed. Thank you for you responses you can view the results following the link below. You are welcome to download a copy to use elsewhere.

Results: OMM Alps 2018

A weekend of big ascents, heavy rain showers & epic scenery. 

Well done to all the competitors. It was a tough day for with team facing some interesting route options. Do they take on the big climbs or stick to the meadows and forests. The teams reported that the big ascents and changing terrain made judging the distance they could cover tricky.

For those competitors who were taking part in their first mountain marathon it was a steep learning curve both literally metaphorically but a positive mental attitude saw them through to the end of day one. The spirit of OMM is alive and well at the overnight camp, in spite of heavy showers and low cloud competitors had a chance to chat with each other, sharing stories of the day over roaring stoves and wet tents.

What an amazing weekend!!!! Well done to all the competitors and thank you for making it such an incredible event. Please tell all your friends and running partners so we can grow the event.

See you in Switzerland in September next year.

OMM Event Team.

Thoughts of the Technical Director

My job is it to provide the competitor with a memorable yet achievable challenge, and hopefully something that they can look back upon with fond memories. This obviously has to be reflected in the course and before I design the 4 courses for the OMM, I always reflect what the OMM Alps stands for. The most important thing that sets it apart from the main OMM is – the Alps. This OMM stands for big heights and big views. Naturally, this then includes long climbs and killer descends. I believe the course reflected this quite well. The longest climb of the race was faced by the A course and possibly the Long Score on the first day, climbing up from the Reintal valley to the Schachenhaus, an ascent of around 800 m. While this might not have looked like the cracker of a climb it was on the map, the section between 84 and 34 took the fastest team around 80 minutes with slower teams spending significantly more time on it. I hope the view from the Schachenhaus compensated for some of the sweat.

Competitors on the Long Score course on day one needed to carefully consider if they had the physical ability to take in the set of controls on the high ridge in the north before moving through the Reintal Valley towards the finish line. The many teams who incurred some substantial time penalties proved the point that some detailed planning and a good comprehension of ones physical ability can make the difference between a top and a disappointing result. I think this also reflects a major aspect of the OMM. It is not enough to be a strong runner and solid navigator; teams also need to make important decisions about route choice during the race, even if this looks at first like missing out some substantial points. For the B course on day one, the ascent straight after the start to the Eckbauer hopefully gave competitors a similar experience of a long ascent with the wide views of the Werdenfellserland from the top.

Apart from designing the course and allocating the checkpoints, compiling the map is the other main responsibility of the Technical Director. Coming from an orienteering background I place great emphasis on a highly detailed and accurate map. Unfortunately, the necessary scale of the OMM map of 1-30,000 always means a compromise between detail and generalisation. Unlike for the 2017 OMM in Austria, the map data available in Germany is very detailed which gave me the base for what I think was a fantastic map, a map that reflected the high standards of an OMM. The Garmisch map not only had all man made features such as the extensive track and trail network accurately mapped but it also showed the “lay of the land” in a lot more detail. With this I mainly mean contour details, but also water and rock features. The available information gave us much more possibilities to find challenging control post locations.

The reality of designing a course in the highly developed Alps means that there is a dense network of trails and paths, making navigation easier than say in the trackless highlands of Scotland. For me it was important that navigation was also an important part of the race and that teams who might not be as physically strong but were superb navigators, had an equal chance at winning. In short, a successful OMM competitor in the Alps has to be not only physical strong but also a good navigator. I try to achieve this with the location of the control posts and from feedback I got from the athletes this seemed to have worked reasonably well especially on the more rolling terrain in the centre of the map on day 2. My aim selecting control post locations was twofold: Firstly, giving the competitors the chance to move cross country between 2 control posts. In the dense forest and rough underground this needed solid map and compass work, a skill that is sometimes neglected in the age of GPS and Google maps. The second challenge was then to accurately navigate into the control circle from a safe attack point. The post itself was to be located at a definite location such as a spring, hill top or re-entrant which was equally clearly marked on the map. With the difficult terrain surrounding many controls, to accurately approach it without loosing time again needed solid compass and map work. Even the neglected skill of counting steps might have come in handy. Again, feedback from competitors seemed to be positive that a navigational challenge was appreciated and an integral part of an OMM, as long as the map is accurate and the post is in the right place. On the other hand this can also lead to frustration if a team could not locate a check point but this is part of an OMM also. Be assured that we take the setting of the control posts very serious. It took Stuart and me around 45 minutes to accurately place control 81 which was one of the more difficult ones. It might have been only around 300m from the nearest track yet we cross referenced the position walking into the control from 3 different attack points counting steps on a bearing to get it right. This control was definitely on the right place. Most of the other more difficult control post locations we either put out in with teams of 2 or had it checked by another member of the hill team after placing it. This we will increase further for next year’s edition. And lastly, I hope you forgive me the location of control 72: seeing those 2 rock pillars during the recce, and noticing that they were clearly marked on the map as well as scaleable, I just couldn’t stop myself from placing 72 right on top of it.

Here is a quick note on the location of the finish line on day 2 and the subsequent last minute change in the course. This is one of the realities of organising an outdoor race: while the hill team would like the start line/finish line/overnight campsite in the most amazing and remote location, the logistics team would prefer something like the lobby of the hotel/train station/check in area of an international airport. You get the drift? These locations are always a compromise between course wants and logistics requirements. Originally we thought to put the finish line inside the ski stadium: an iconic location right at the edge of town. However, Jürgen organized us the perfect logistics base in the town’s event centre, with toilets, assembly hall, catering, basically the whole lot. This was the deciding factor to locate the finish there as it was simply the best place considering all angles. However, this then necessitated to cross a frequently used railway line as well as a busy road. Having competitors all charged up for a final sprint dashing across a railway crossing just in front of an approaching train was just a little bit too much of a risk for me. Therefore it was decided to time out the section between the railway and road crossing, but leave the finish sprint into the event centre timed. However, when we set up shop at the finish line on Sunday a large fire engine parade and exhibition took place on the approach. While some teams might have made the dash across, others would have been delayed by the parade, making the whole section an uneven playing field. Therefore we decided to have the overall timing stopped at the railway crossing. I think this was the best of all the not so good options in these circumstances.

Before I talk a little bit about next year’s OMM, I want to mention all the other people in the hill team without whom there would have been no OMM Alps. You all know Dave, the senior of any OMM hill team, although senior does not do him justice. If I am as fit as he is come at his age, I have done everything right. Regarding course and navigation, our thoughts are similar and having somebody with his vast experience to bounce ideas off, I believe makes any OMM course so much better. I wouldn’t want to plan the next year’s OMM Switzerland course without him. After counting on Carsten not only for all recces, but also for collecting controls for the 2017 OMM it came as a big shock when I heard he broke half the bones in his shoulder going down some hill on a tricycle. This cut him out for any physical course work, but I am glad he still joined us guarding busy control 66 near the top of the cable car as well as doing the same with the last control on day 2 at the railway crossing: perhaps an inglorious job that had to be done by somebody. I am glad that Ronny had time to finally join our team. Ronny is not only the current Bavarian State orienteering champion but also a superb runner and therefore destined to collect all these controls in far away places. I think he appreciated the training he got and I am counting on his orienteering skills to put out controls in 2019. A late edition to the team was my friend Claus from Malaysia who then was tasked with troubleshooting any controls before it impacted on the race. Thanks to you all. My 2 young sons Jack and Lukas enjoyed handing out maps at the start and cheering with the bells at the finish and Jack now is raring to hit the age when he himself is allowed to compete in an OMM. And lastly there is Jürgen and his team who did all the jobs that are needed behind the scenes to make an OMM possible, most importantly getting us the permission to use this fantastic area, but also looking after all those nitty gritty jobs of finish line management, event centre, food and accommodation…. The list goes on! Peter and Dave (yes, same names) of the timing team did a fantastic job, expressed through the fact that there names weren’t mentioned because there were no problems with timing.

Now it is time to look forward to next years OMM in Switzerland. I have already procured the maps of the area and I am impressed how accurate the Swiss topo maps are. With this in mind, I hope I can continue with the approach of the 2018 OMM of coming up with challenging control post location that put emphasis on map and compass work. I have already very high expectations of both the map and the course I imagine.  I also noted that the terrain we are looking at is at least as steep as Garmisch, meaning equally impressive big heights and big vistas, even it this means the price you have to pay for this are again the long climbs and knee buckling descends that puts the Alps into the OMM!

GET TRAINING

See how everyone is training for this years race on Strava.

GET ADVICE

You can arrange lifts and ask advice in the Competitors Group.

36 year Bob Graham record smashed!

36 year Bob Graham Round record smashed!!

Yesterday (Sun 8th July) the classic Lakeland round that sees runners visits 42 peaks was smashed by Killian Jornet. 

For the majority of runners taking on the 63miles & 27000ft of the Bob Graham round is considered an outstanding achievement.
The previous record holder Billy Bland who’s time of 13hrs 53mins was on hand to applaud the challenger en route and also shared his celebrations at the finish at Keswick’s Moot Hall. Jornet smashed Billy’s 1982 record by over an hour setting a new record of 12hrs 52mins.

“Thanks Billy, I had better conditions than you, the best pacers and your inspiration to give everything. And even like that it was sooo sooo hard.”

The attempt was kept under wraps with pictures starting to emerge on social media early Sunday morning.

“Thanks to Carl, Chris, Martin, Josh, Jebby, Steve, Paul, Andrew, Neil, Paul and all the guys who has been helping out, without you guys it wouldn’t been possible.

About the Bob Graham Round:

The challenge is named after Keswick guest-house owner Bob Graham who first completed the circuit in 1932. The traditional challenge starts and ends at the Moot Hall in the centre of Keswick and runners are expected to complete the course in 24 hours.

See Killian’s split times…

Killian has uploaded his round to Strava. You can see all his split times here.

Mountain Marathon Kit List

[mk_page_section bg_image=”https://theomm.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/uk2017_0844.jpg” attachment=”fixed” bg_position=”center bottom” bg_stretch=”true” min_height=”300″ full_width=”true” padding_top=”70″ padding_bottom=”20″ first_page=”false” last_page=”false” sidebar=”sidebar-1″ predefined_bg=”9″]

[mk_fancy_title color=”#ffffff” size=”70″ force_font_size=”true” font_weight=”bold” font_style=”normal” letter_spacing=”3″ margin_top=”60″ font_family=”Montserrat” font_type=”google” align=”center”]KIT LIST[/mk_fancy_title]
[/mk_page_section][mk_page_section predefined_bg=”” first_page=”false” last_page=”false”]
[mk_padding_divider visibility=”hidden-sm”]
[mk_padding_divider visibility=”hidden-sm”]

OMM MANDATORY EQUIPMENT LIST

Each individual and team is responsible for being properly equipped for two days unsupported racing in exposed terrain at the end of October.

This list should be seen as a minimum requirement only. Check the weather forecast, your previous experience and use sound judgement for the kit you should be wearing and carrying. The organisers reserve the right to disqualify any competitors who, in their opinion, do not have the necessary kit to survive in an emergency situation. Cotton clothing is not suitable.

EACH COMPETITOR MUST WEAR OR CARRY THE FOLLOWING:

  • Taped waterproof jacket with hood
  • Taped waterproof trousers
  • Clothing suitable for mountain running and walking
  • Spare base layer top
  • Spare full leg cover
  • Warm layer top
  • Hat, Gloves & Socks
  • Footwear designed for trail and fell use
  • Head torch capable of giving useable light for a minimum of 12 hours
  • Whistle & Compass
  • Map (as supplied)
  • Insulated Sleeping bag
  • First aid equipment
  • Pen/pencil and paper capable of being used in wet conditions
  • Survival bag (not a sheet)
  • Rucksack
  • Emergency rations
  • Water carrying capability

Spare warm kit and insulated sleeping bag must be waterproofed (i.e. in a drybag)

EACH TEAM MUST CARRY THE FOLLOWING AT ALL TIMES:

  • Cooking equipment including stove with sufficient fuel for duration of the race, plus some spare for emergency use, left at the end of the event
  • Tent with sewn in groundsheet
  • Food for 36 hours for two people
[mk_padding_divider visibility=”hidden-sm”]
  • 52nd OMM Gas Pre-order

    £5.00£6.00
[/mk_page_section][mk_page_section predefined_bg=”” first_page=”false” last_page=”false”]
[mk_padding_divider]
[/mk_page_section]